W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > February 2003

RE: Diffs between prev WD and latest rev

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:15:56 -0800
Message-ID: <92456F6B84D1324C943905BEEAE0278E02D30CF2@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Cc: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>

OK, so the agenda is actually at[14] :-(

Sorry!

Gudge

[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2003Feb/0045.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:mgudgin@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: 19 February 2003 20:09
> To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> Cc: Jonathan Marsh
> Subject: Diffs between prev WD and latest rev
> 
> 
> 
> We have publication listed on our agenda[1] this week, under 
> 4.1(d). To help us with this agenda item, I've produced a 
> list of the differences in Part 1 between the WD we recently 
> published[11] and the current revision of the editor's copy[12,13].
> 
> 1.    The text:
> 
>   "The target namespace represents an unambiguous name for 
> the intended semantics of the WSDL Infoset. The 
> targetNamespace URI SHOULD point to a human or machine 
> processable document that directly or indirectly defines the 
> semantics of the WSDL Infoset."
> 
> was added to section 2.1.2[1,2] reflecting our decision back 
> in October to say something about WSDL semantics.
> 
> 2.	Various changes related to operation names were made, as
> detailed in[3,4]
> 
> 3.	Appendix C was added as per our resolution to R120[5,6]
> 
> 4.	The text in[7,8] that previously read:
> 
>   "Identical to that of <attval>application/xml</attval> as 
> described in [RFC 3023], section 5."
> 
> was changed to 
> 
>   "Either a syntax identical to that of 
> <attval>application/xml</attval> as described in [RFC 3023] 
> section 5, or the syntax defined in C.2 Fragment Identifiers."
> 
> 5.	The name attribute on <wsdl:input/>, <wsdl:output/> and
> <wsdl:fault/> in <wsdl:operation> was made optional[9,10]. It 
> was listed as being mandatory, which was an editorial error.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Gudge
> 
> [1] 
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12
.xml?rev=1
.51&content-type=text/xml#Definitions_XMLRep
[2]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html?rev=
1.22&content-type=text/html#Definitions_XMLRep
[3]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml?rev=1
.37.2.3&content-type=text/xml
[4]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html?rev=
1.18.2.1&content-type=text/html
[5]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml?rev=1
.51&content-type=text/xml#wsdl-uri-references
[6]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html?rev=
1.22&content-type=text/html#wsdl-uri-references
[7]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml?rev=1
.51&content-type=text/xml#ietf-reg
[8]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html?rev=
1.22&content-type=text/html#ietf-reg
[9]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml?rev=1
.51&content-type=text/xml#MessageReference_XMLRep
[10]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html?rev=
1.22&content-type=text/html#MessageReference_XMLRep
[11] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-wsdl12-20030124/
[12]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml?rev=1
.51&content-type=text/xml
[13]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.html?rev=
1.22&content-type=text/html
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2003 15:16:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:22 GMT