W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Property-based action syntax

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 13:22:07 +0200
Message-ID: <3E915F5F.1010208@crf.canon.fr>
To: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@macromedia.com>
CC: "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>, Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>


The feature stuff is currently available in a separate document[1]. What 
is not yet described is where the <feature> and <property> elements can 
appear, and the exact relationship between features and properties 
(since they can appear independently).

Once this is settled, I expect we (the editors) will be moving the above 
text into Part 1. My recollection/understanding is that features and 
properties can be any of the following:
* direct children of the Interface Component (i.e. at the portType 
level, valid for all operations and all bindings);
* direct children of the Operation Interface Component (i.e. at the 
operation level, valid for this operation in all bindings);
* direct children of the Binding Component (i.e. at the binding level, 
valid for all operations in this binding);
* direct children of the Operation Binding Component (i.e. valid for 
this operation in this binding only).




Glen Daniels wrote:
> WS-Desc'ers:
> Per my somewhat long-standing action item to express a property-based
> representation of the SOAP 1.2 action parameter, here is a possible
> syntax:
> <property
> uri="http://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap/features/action/action"> 
> *action-uri-goes-here*
 > </property>
> This can be placed anywhere the <property> element is allowed,
> although it makes the most sense inside a <soap:binding>.  Since the
> SOAP HTTP binding now uses the value of this property for the SOAP
> action parameter, this provides a way to set it in WSDL.  Clearly
> this would need to be turned into "spec-ese" and placed in the
> appropriate location in the spec.
> NOTE : I don't actually see the features/properties stuff we agreed
> on at the last F2F in the working draft of the spec.  Editors?
> --Glen
Received on Monday, 7 April 2003 07:22:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:41 UTC