W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > April 2003

Re: Property-based action syntax

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 10:32:26 +0600
Message-ID: <004001c2fd87$dd331540$c267b809@lankabook2>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

One concern I have about P&F is that over-use of P&Fs can make the
simple case harder. The SOAPAction is an example for me- yes,
in theory its a property, but in practice its a *special* property ..
everyone knows what it is etc.. So I would prefer to see a simple,
direct syntax for setting such "special" properties rather than
saying all properties are created equal. That is, I prefer something
similar to what we have now for this:
    <soapAction uri="..."/>

Otherwise, taken to an extreme, everything about a service is a
property; including the interface it supports and the address at
which its available. Clearly we don't want to go that far.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Glen Daniels" <gdaniels@macromedia.com>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 10:37 PM
Subject: Property-based action syntax

> WS-Desc'ers:
> Per my somewhat long-standing action item to express a property-based
representation of the SOAP 1.2 action parameter, here is a possible syntax:
> <property uri="http://www.w3.org/2002/12/soap/features/action/action">
> *action-uri-goes-here*
> </property>
> This can be placed anywhere the <property> element is allowed, although it
makes the most sense inside a <soap:binding>.  Since the SOAP HTTP binding
now uses the value of this property for the SOAP action parameter, this
provides a way to set it in WSDL.  Clearly this would need to be turned into
"spec-ese" and placed in the appropriate location in the spec.
> NOTE: I don't actually see the features/properties stuff we agreed on at
the last F2F in the working draft of the spec.  Editors?
> --Glen
Received on Tuesday, 8 April 2003 00:31:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:41 UTC