W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2002

RE: serviceType attribute on service element not defined in WSDL SCHEMA

From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 10:27:29 -0700
Message-ID: <2E33960095B58E40A4D3345AB9F65EC1095BE2C3@win-msg-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
To: "Stefano Zacchiroli" <zack@cs.unibo.it>
Cc: "Web Services Description ML" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Stefano, we're moving away from an explicit service type and toward a
model where a port type may extend other port types. To see where this
is headed, you may wish to take a look at the current working draft.

http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl12/wsdl12.xml 

--Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefano Zacchiroli [mailto:zack@cs.unibo.it]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 10:02 AM
> To: Web Services Description ML
> Subject: serviceType attribute on service element not defined in WSDL
> SCHEMA
> 
> 
> The "serviceType" attribute of the "service" element isn't mentioned
in
> WSDL SCHEMA while WSDL specification mention it.
> 
> Quotings:
> 
>    Section 2.6:
>     A service description component has a REQUIRED "serviceType"
>     property which MUST be the qualified name of a serviceType
>     description component.
> 
>    Section 3.7:
>     The serviceType attribute allows one to indicate the serviceType
of
>     this service by referring to a previously defined serviceType.
> 
> In the WSDL SCHEMA the service element is definided having type
> "tService":
> 
>   <xs:complexType name="tService" >
>     <xs:complexContent>
>       <xs:extension base="wsdl:tExtensibleDocumented" >
>         <xs:sequence>
>           <xs:element name="port" type="wsdl:tPort" minOccurs="0"
> maxOccurs="unbounded" />
>         </xs:sequence>
>         <xs:attribute name="name" type="xs:NCName" use="required" />
>       </xs:extension>
>     </xs:complexContent>
>   </xs:complexType>
> 
> which doesn't mention any attribute named "serviceType".
> 
> Thus validating a WSDL document against this SCHEMA results in a
> failure.
> 
> Is this a known bug?
> Am I missing something?
> 
> TIA,
> Cheers.
> 
> --
> Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna,
Italy
> zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro
> "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2002 13:28:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:21 GMT