W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > October 2002

Re: importing docs in the same namespace

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 22:49:41 +0600
Message-ID: <012d01c26bc6$12b73b50$9800a8c0@lankabook2>
To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

If we don't allow this the recommended usage style of
WSDL 1.1 no longer works. That basically said split the
interface part of the service to one file and the impl
part to another and import the interface part there -
which still seems like the natural and correct split.

So, I believe this should be another case of how
we diverge from XSD import semantics.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; "WS-Desc WG (Public)"
<www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 10:34 PM
Subject: RE: importing docs in the same namespace


> The minutes of the 9th May telcon[1] say, regarding import/include:
>
> Resolution: "WSDL import = XSD import + required location"
>
> I checked all the minutes from 7th February to 19th September. So unless
> we changed the above resolution on 26th September ( can't find minutes
> for that telcon right now ) then I think the current text in the ed copy
> is correct.
>
> Gudge
>
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002May/att-0128/01-5-09
> -minutes.html
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
> > Sent: 04 October 2002 17:06
> > To: WS-Desc WG (Public)
> > Subject: importing docs in the same namespace
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I thought we had closed the following issue in the affirmative:
> >
> >     <issue id="issue-importing-documents-in-same-namespace">
> >       <head>Should imports of documents in the same namespace be
> >       possible?</head>
> >       <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source>
> >       <p>WSDL 1.1 allows imports to documents in the same
> >       namespace. The above text does not.</p>
> >     </issue>
> >
> > Am I hallucinating (again)?
> >
> > Sanjiva.
> >
> >
Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 12:51:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:21 GMT