W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > May 2002

Re: issue: optional parts in <message>?

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 20:33:53 +0600
Message-ID: <013601c1f1e6$640b2a70$17aa7cca@lankabook2>
To: "WS-Desc WG \(Public\)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Just to be clear: my preferred position for this issue is to
NOT add any optionality to message parts. I would just rather
keep message as-is.

(Replies to other posts coming ..)

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
To: "WS-Desc WG (Public)" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:18 AM
Subject: issue: optional parts in <message>?


> <issue id="issue-message-parts">
>   <head>Should the message part mechanism be extended to support optional
>         parts etc.?</head>
>   In WSDL 1.1, a message can only be defined to be a sequence of parts.
>   It is not possible to indicate that certain parts may be optional,
>   may occur multiple times, etc.? Should we do that? Overlapping with
>   XML Schema's mechanisms is an obvious concern.
>   <source>Sanjiva Weerawarana</source>
> </issue>
>
> Could we also start discussing this issue please?
>
> Sanjiva.
>
Received on Thursday, 2 May 2002 10:37:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:20 GMT