W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2002

RE: SOAP 1.2 consolidated requirements

From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:02:11 -0800
Message-ID: <2E33960095B58E40A4D3345AB9F65EC1062D8764@win-msg-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: "Web Service Description" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Jean-Jacques, it was obvious. (I must have spaced...) Thanks for
clarifying.

I've plugged these into the next draft of the requirements document
along with some additional simplifications in the InterfaceBindings
section.

One further question: "content type" in DR029 seems to be well covered
between DR028 and requirements on Messages. Do you agree?

DR028
Describe SOAP 1.2 Messages, including Header, Body, encoding, fault,
RPC, actor. (Charter says: "must describe Messages available via
Interface", "must describe error Messages", and "make sure SOAP 1.2
extensibility mechanism can be expressed".)

DR029
Describe SOAP 1.2 Header and Body's content type. (Charter says: "must
define [a mechanism for describing data types and structures] based on
XML Schema" and "take into account ending work going on in XML
Protocol".)

--Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:06 AM
To: Jeffrey Schlimmer
Cc: Web Service Description
Subject: Re: SOAP 1.2 consolidated requirements

Jeff, I have tried to prune the list down, about half the original
requirements are marked as (Duplicate), but I actually refrained from
removing requirements, as I did not thought my mandate extended that
far. I
am sorry this was not more obvious from my email [1].

I don't think it makes sense to prune the list further down, or the
requirements will become too general; seven "SOAP" requirements sound
like a
good number (down from 13 ;-)).

Jean-Jacques.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Mar/0044.html

Jeffrey Schlimmer wrote:

> Jean-Jacques, thank you for stepping up and culling this list of
> requirements from the overall set. Is there any chance you can propose
a
> simplified combination of these requirements like David Booth did for
> the Simplicity requirements? [1]
>
> --Jeff
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Mar/0005.html
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:42 AM
> To: Web Service Description
> Subject: SOAP 1.2 consolidated requirements
>
> I took a todo to provide a consoladited list of SOAP 1.2 requirements.
> Well, here's the list!
>
> I believe this discharges me of my action item.
>
> Jean-Jacques.
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2002 18:06:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:19 GMT