W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2002

Re: SOAP 1.2 consolidated requirements

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 10:09:51 +0100
Message-ID: <3CA18C5F.92F6535E@crf.canon.fr>
To: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
CC: Web Service Description <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Jeff,

Yes, I agree, DR028 is the more general requirement and subsumes DR029.

Thanks for updating the requirements document.

Jean-Jacques.

Jeffrey Schlimmer wrote:

> Jean-Jacques, it was obvious. (I must have spaced...) Thanks for
> clarifying.
>
> I've plugged these into the next draft of the requirements document
> along with some additional simplifications in the InterfaceBindings
> section.
>
> One further question: "content type" in DR029 seems to be well covered
> between DR028 and requirements on Messages. Do you agree?
>
> DR028
> Describe SOAP 1.2 Messages, including Header, Body, encoding, fault,
> RPC, actor. (Charter says: "must describe Messages available via
> Interface", "must describe error Messages", and "make sure SOAP 1.2
> extensibility mechanism can be expressed".)
>
> DR029
> Describe SOAP 1.2 Header and Body's content type. (Charter says: "must
> define [a mechanism for describing data types and structures] based on
> XML Schema" and "take into account ending work going on in XML
> Protocol".)
>
> --Jeff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 5:06 AM
> To: Jeffrey Schlimmer
> Cc: Web Service Description
> Subject: Re: SOAP 1.2 consolidated requirements
>
> Jeff, I have tried to prune the list down, about half the original
> requirements are marked as (Duplicate), but I actually refrained from
> removing requirements, as I did not thought my mandate extended that
> far. I
> am sorry this was not more obvious from my email [1].
>
> I don't think it makes sense to prune the list further down, or the
> requirements will become too general; seven "SOAP" requirements sound
> like a
> good number (down from 13 ;-)).
>
> Jean-Jacques.
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Mar/0044.html
>
> Jeffrey Schlimmer wrote:
>
> > Jean-Jacques, thank you for stepping up and culling this list of
> > requirements from the overall set. Is there any chance you can propose
> a
> > simplified combination of these requirements like David Booth did for
> > the Simplicity requirements? [1]
> >
> > --Jeff
> >
> > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2002Mar/0005.html
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:42 AM
> > To: Web Service Description
> > Subject: SOAP 1.2 consolidated requirements
> >
> > I took a todo to provide a consoladited list of SOAP 1.2 requirements.
> > Well, here's the list!
> >
> > I believe this discharges me of my action item.
> >
> > Jean-Jacques.
Received on Wednesday, 27 March 2002 04:11:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:19 GMT