W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2002

Re: WS-I

From: <ryman@ca.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 15:53:21 -0500
To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Cc: glover@ca.ibm.com
Message-ID: <OF32ABC6B4.3A04B222-ON85256B7C.00725162@torolab.ibm.com>
Sounds good to me. By cc I'm giving Tom Glover, who is the IBM member, a
heads up.

Tom - the proposal is have some relation between the W3C WS Description WG
and WS-I,  to coordinate efforts at addressing the WSDL 1.1 interop
problems.

Arthur Ryman


                                                                                                                                    
                    Jeff Mischkinsky                                                                                                
                    <jeff.mischkinsky@o       To:     "Stumbo, William K" <WStumbo@crt.xerox.com>, www-ws-desc@w3.org               
                    racle.com>                cc:     "Stumbo, William K" <WStumbo@crt.xerox.com>                                   
                    Sent by:                  Subject:     Re: WS-I                                                                 
                    www-ws-desc-request                                                                                             
                    @w3.org                                                                                                         
                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                    
                    03/14/2002 02:43 PM                                                                                             
                    Please respond to                                                                                               
                    Jeff Mischkinsky                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                    



At 10:34 AM 3/14/02, Stumbo, William K wrote:
>I didn't detect any clear direction on WS-I coming out of today's
telephone
>conference.  It seems we've currently tied any working relationship to the
>definition of our scope.
>
> From the comments made by those involved with WS-I (Arthur?), it seems to
me
>that we can probably craft some sort of working relationship that benefits
>both parties.  Whether we need to formalize a relationship, I can't say.
>
>I'd like to suggest, as a way of making progress, that the WS-I members
put
>a proposal for a relationship on the table.  We  can debate the merits of
>working together until we're blue in the face.  Lets focus the discussion
>around a specific proposal and see where that goes.

This is an excellent idea!! As a WS-I Board member I'm more than happt to
facilitate this course of action.

I'll take an action item to get the newly formed WS-I Board liaison
committee to talk about doing this as well.

cheers,
    jeff


>What information could the WG expect from WS-I?  How should we expect to
use
>it?  What can we provide WS-I that would help their mission?
>
>Bill Stumbo
>Xerox Research & Technology
>Solutions & Services Technology Center
>
>wstumbo@crt.xerox.com
>     Phone:      585.422.0616
>     Fax:        585.265.8424

--
Jeff Mischkinsky                    jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com
Consulting Member Technical Staff   +1(650)506-1975 (voice)
Oracle Corporation                  +1(650)506-7225 (fax)
400 Oracle Parkway, M/S 4OP960
Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
Received on Thursday, 14 March 2002 15:53:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:19 GMT