Re: DR109: Interfaces separate from concrete deployment

Is this to be read as the same interface describes the protocol etc.
separetely, or the service is described by two separate "interfaces"? I.e.
is there a single XML file with two children information items, or are
there two separate XML files (or are both alternatives supported by this
new requirement)?

I missed the last conference call, so I apologize in advance if this has
been addressed already.

Jean-Jacques.

Jeffrey Schlimmer wrote:

> During the last teleconference, the WG agreed to remove the derivations
> / inheritance issue from DR033 and DR034 and combine the two
> requirements into a single one that clarified the requirement to
> abstract from transport and wire format specifics. Below is proposed
> wording for that requirement. Comments welcome.
>
> DR109 [MUST] The language must describe interfaces separate from their
> concrete protocol, transport, data format or wire format deployment.
> (See also DR046.)
>
> --Jeff