W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > March 2002

RE: DR109: Interfaces separate from concrete deployment

From: Jeffrey Schlimmer <jeffsch@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 18:39:40 -0800
Message-ID: <2E33960095B58E40A4D3345AB9F65EC105D58FE6@win-msg-01.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
During the teleconference, we agreed that the underlying requirement was
captured by

R071 [MUST] JS: Be able to partition a description across multiple


-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:08 AM
To: Jeffrey Schlimmer
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Re: DR109: Interfaces separate from concrete deployment

Is this to be read as the same interface describes the protocol etc.
separetely, or the service is described by two separate "interfaces"?
I.e. is there a single XML file with two children information items, or
are there two separate XML files (or are both alternatives supported by
this new requirement)?

I missed the last conference call, so I apologize in advance if this has
been addressed already.


Jeffrey Schlimmer wrote:

> During the last teleconference, the WG agreed to remove the 
> derivations / inheritance issue from DR033 and DR034 and combine the 
> two requirements into a single one that clarified the requirement to 
> abstract from transport and wire format specifics. Below is proposed 
> wording for that requirement. Comments welcome.
> DR109 [MUST] The language must describe interfaces separate from their

> concrete protocol, transport, data format or wire format deployment. 
> (See also DR046.)
> --Jeff
Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 21:43:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:54:37 UTC