W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2002

Re: (editorial and other) issues

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 23:33:32 +0200 (CEST)
To: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
cc: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0207152333300.7124-100000@mail.idoox.com>

+1

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet Corporation
                   http://www.systinet.com/



On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote:

 > 
 > Non-editorial issues (IMO):
 > 
 >    * 33 Distinction between RPC style and document style [given current
 >      thread]
 >    * 50 Array Declaration Issues [there is a larger issue concercing arrays]
 > 
 > Jean-Jacques.
 > 
 > Jonathan Marsh wrote:
 > 
 > > 8. Editorial Issues
 > >    Issues to be resolved by editors:
 > >     #7 xsd:binary in example
 > >     #8 Grammar for Attribute Extensibility
 > >     #9 Example 1 type
 > >     #10 Example 3 element order bug
 > >     #11 <import> grammar
 > >     #12 <part> name attribute
 > >     #13 Parameter Order missing from schema
 > >     #16 Binding operations in portType
 > >     #19 soap:headerfault optional?
 > >     #20 <soap:header> 'part' or 'parts' attribute?
 > >     #22 Specification not XML Infoset based
 > >     #33 Distinction between RPC style and document style
 > >     #38 Clarify the what kinds of extensibility elements go where.
 > >     #43 Does order matter for the child elements of "definitions"?
 > >     #44 "name" attribute of "soap:fault" is not defined in schema
 > >     #45 "use" attribute of "fault" should be optional
 > >     #46 "transport" attribute of "soap:binding" should be optional
 > >     #47 "soap:operation" should be optional
 > >     #48 "use" attribute of "soap:body" should be optional
 > >     #49 Inconsistency in "soap:header" specification
 > >     #50 Array Declaration Issues
 > >     #59 MIME Binding permits 0 parts in multipart/related
 > >     #60 Text in the WSDL spec inconsistency about optional parts
 > >
 > 
Received on Monday, 15 July 2002 17:33:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:21 GMT