W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2002

Re: (editorial and other) issues

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:49:43 +0200
Message-ID: <3D2D7EE7.E0C85F6E@crf.canon.fr>
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
CC: www-ws-desc@w3.org

Non-editorial issues (IMO):

   * 33 Distinction between RPC style and document style [given current
     thread]
   * 50 Array Declaration Issues [there is a larger issue concercing arrays]

Jean-Jacques.

Jonathan Marsh wrote:

> 8. Editorial Issues
>    Issues to be resolved by editors:
>     #7 xsd:binary in example
>     #8 Grammar for Attribute Extensibility
>     #9 Example 1 type
>     #10 Example 3 element order bug
>     #11 <import> grammar
>     #12 <part> name attribute
>     #13 Parameter Order missing from schema
>     #16 Binding operations in portType
>     #19 soap:headerfault optional?
>     #20 <soap:header> 'part' or 'parts' attribute?
>     #22 Specification not XML Infoset based
>     #33 Distinction between RPC style and document style
>     #38 Clarify the what kinds of extensibility elements go where.
>     #43 Does order matter for the child elements of "definitions"?
>     #44 "name" attribute of "soap:fault" is not defined in schema
>     #45 "use" attribute of "fault" should be optional
>     #46 "transport" attribute of "soap:binding" should be optional
>     #47 "soap:operation" should be optional
>     #48 "use" attribute of "soap:body" should be optional
>     #49 Inconsistency in "soap:header" specification
>     #50 Array Declaration Issues
>     #59 MIME Binding permits 0 parts in multipart/related
>     #60 Text in the WSDL spec inconsistency about optional parts
>
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 08:50:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:21 GMT