W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2002

RE: WSDL 1.2: Updated draft (June 30) - typos and minor errors

From: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 10:41:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CB1FF0A474AEA84EA0206D5B05F6A4CB01FC9E06@S1001EXM02.macromedia.com>
To: "'Jean-Jacques Moreau'" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "'Liu Kevin'" <kevin.liu@sap.com>
Cc: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "'WS-Desc WG (Public)'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>


I noticed this problem with the target namespace wording was well.
+1 to rewording this.

--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia




Jean-Jacques wrote:
> >>>Section 2 (text above the box for "issue-require-targetnamspace")  the
> new text for targetNamespace is not very clean - maybe just for me. I
> believe the resolution is to make defintion@targetNamespace required. All
> children elements defined by this wsdl document belongs to this namespace. I
> know we are talking about abstract model here, but if map to the wsdl
> elements, the wording reads like wsdl1.2 requires that every individual
> child elements, except type element,  have a targetNamespace attribute. I
> don't believe that's what we meant.
>
> Again, this may be just my own interpretation, other people may interpret
> differently. To avoid future confusion,  can we make the wording more
> straight-forward?

I think you're right, this needs rewording. NOT done.
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 10:42:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:21 GMT