- From: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 10:41:50 -0400
- To: "'Jean-Jacques Moreau'" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "'Liu Kevin'" <kevin.liu@sap.com>
- Cc: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "'WS-Desc WG (Public)'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
I noticed this problem with the target namespace wording was well. +1 to rewording this. -- Tom Jordahl Macromedia Jean-Jacques wrote: > >>>Section 2 (text above the box for "issue-require-targetnamspace") the > new text for targetNamespace is not very clean - maybe just for me. I > believe the resolution is to make defintion@targetNamespace required. All > children elements defined by this wsdl document belongs to this namespace. I > know we are talking about abstract model here, but if map to the wsdl > elements, the wording reads like wsdl1.2 requires that every individual > child elements, except type element, have a targetNamespace attribute. I > don't believe that's what we meant. > > Again, this may be just my own interpretation, other people may interpret > differently. To avoid future confusion, can we make the wording more > straight-forward? I think you're right, this needs rewording. NOT done.
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 10:42:31 UTC