RE: WSDL 1.2: Updated draft (June 30) - typos and minor errors

Don't worry, when I'm done with the abstact model, and the mapping from
that model to the XML syntax, it will be nice and clean

Gudge

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:tomj@macromedia.com] 
Sent: 02 July 2002 15:42
To: 'Jean-Jacques Moreau'; 'Liu Kevin'
Cc: 'Sanjiva Weerawarana'; 'WS-Desc WG (Public)'
Subject: RE: WSDL 1.2: Updated draft (June 30) - typos and minor errors




I noticed this problem with the target namespace wording was well.
+1 to rewording this.

--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia




Jean-Jacques wrote:
> >>>Section 2 (text above the box for "issue-require-targetnamspace")  
> >>>the
> new text for targetNamespace is not very clean - maybe just for me. I 
> believe the resolution is to make defintion@targetNamespace required. 
> All children elements defined by this wsdl document belongs to this 
> namespace. I know we are talking about abstract model here, but if map

> to the wsdl elements, the wording reads like wsdl1.2 requires that 
> every individual child elements, except type element,  have a 
> targetNamespace attribute. I don't believe that's what we meant.
>
> Again, this may be just my own interpretation, other people may 
> interpret differently. To avoid future confusion,  can we make the 
> wording more straight-forward?

I think you're right, this needs rewording. NOT done.