W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > July 2002

RE: issue-intra-port-relationship (was ..Freshly updated draft of part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Ser vi ce Description Telcon]))

From: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2002 10:39:24 -0400
Message-ID: <CB1FF0A474AEA84EA0206D5B05F6A4CB01FC9E02@S1001EXM02.macromedia.com>
To: Tom Jordahl <tomj@macromedia.com>, "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>, "'Prasad Yendluri'" <pyendluri@webmethods.com>, "'Jonathan Marsh'" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, "'www-ws-desc@w3.org'" <www-ws-desc@w3.org>


To be clear here, I was referring to the single service per definition, not the intra-port issue.

--
Tom Jordahl


-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:tomj@macromedia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 10:19 AM
To: 'Sanjiva Weerawarana'; 'Prasad Yendluri'; 'Jonathan Marsh';
'www-ws-desc@w3.org'
Subject: RE: issue-intra-port-relationship (was ..Freshly updated draft
of part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Servi
ce Description Telcon]))




Well, I thought it was a good idea too (simplify, simplify, simplify) but as Sanjiva said, there wasn't much support in the room for it.

--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia


-----Original Message-----
From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@watson.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 10:11 PM
To: Prasad Yendluri; Jonathan Marsh; www-ws-desc@w3.org
Subject: Re: issue-intra-port-relationship (was ..Freshly updated draft
of part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web
Service Description Telcon]))



"Prasad Yendluri" <pyendluri@webmethods.com> writes:
> I have also seen proposals limiting one service per WSDL. If that makes
> through this restriction would not only restrict one from putting such
> related ports not only in the same service but also in the same WSDL as
> they need to be in separate services. Given the other restriction that
> was proposed in the conference call that every WSDL MUST have a unique
> targetNamespace, it will result in these not being in the same
> targetNamespace as well..

We resolved the multiple services issue too at the F2F saying you
can have >= 1 service(s) in a single WSDL document. I was pushing to
have a single (complete) doc restricted to exactly one serviceType
but >=1 service(s), all of that single serviceType, but didn't get
much (any?) support for it.

Bye,

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Prasad Yendluri" <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
To: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>; "Jonathan Marsh"
<jmarsh@microsoft.com>; <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 1:06 AM
Subject: Re: issue-intra-port-relationship (was ..Freshly updated draft of
part1 (was: Re: Overloading [was RE: Minutes, 27 June 2002 Web Service
Description Telcon]))
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2002 10:39:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:21 GMT