W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > June 2003

RE: SOAP UML diagram

From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:27:50 -0700
Message-ID: <EDDE2977F3D216428E903370E3EBDDC90811F7@MAIL01.stc.com>
To: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

> I'm confused about what a Module is.  Why must it have at least one
> Header Block, but a Feature can exist without a Header Block?  Is a
> Module a necessary concept here?

AFAIK Modules are special types of Features that are expressed via SOAP Headers. So if I provide reliable messaging via headers like in WS-RM that is a Module. But if I provide it instead via binding to a transport that supports reliable messaging, that is just a Feature.

Received on Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:27:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:07 UTC