- From: Francis McCabe <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:27:34 -0700
- To: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
If you look at the current draft of teh spec you will find the message path concept in there. Please take a look and comment on it. Frank On Friday, July 11, 2003, at 05:40 AM, Hugo Haas wrote: > > * Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> [2003-07-10 17:53-0400] > [..] >> If we want to generalize terms because we still haven't come to >> complete consensus as to whether we are scoping our architecture to >> WSDL and SOAP plus other goop, then why not look to SOAP1.2 first >> before simply making stuff up. > > I am very happy with the idea of adopting SOAP's > receiver/sender/intermediary concepts. This is where I was headed with > my last comments about intermediaries[1] with a slightly different > terminology. > > I don't think that SOAP's concepts will limit us in what we want to > model, and in the end, trying to come up with a different approach is > likely to confuse people familiar with SOAP -- which will be anybody > reading our document. > > Regards, > > Hugo > > 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/20030707133259.GG21693@w3.org > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ >
Received on Friday, 11 July 2003 16:52:28 UTC