Re: Message Recipient 2.2.26 & Sender 2.2.27 text

* Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> [2003-07-10 17:53-0400]
[..]
> If we want to generalize terms because we still haven't come to
> complete consensus as to whether we are scoping our architecture to
> WSDL and SOAP plus other goop, then why not look to SOAP1.2 first
> before simply making stuff up.

I am very happy with the idea of adopting SOAP's
receiver/sender/intermediary concepts. This is where I was headed with
my last comments about intermediaries[1] with a slightly different
terminology.

I don't think that SOAP's concepts will limit us in what we want to
model, and in the end, trying to come up with a different approach is
likely to confuse people familiar with SOAP -- which will be anybody
reading our document.

Regards,

Hugo

  1. http://www.w3.org/mid/20030707133259.GG21693@w3.org
-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/

Received on Friday, 11 July 2003 09:29:45 UTC