W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > February 2003

Re: Glossary - Working UEB Stuff

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 10:12:56 -0500
To: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <20030206101256.H7571@www.markbaker.ca>

On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 06:58:19PM +0100, Hugo Haas wrote:
> > Element - RF definition is not really a definition, it is sort of a
> > statement that seems to contain an implied definition.  UEB definition
> > is cryptic.  I don't really like either, but I guess I'd go with RF as
> > at least being comprehensible.
> I think that Fielding's dissertation excerpt could be reworded as:
>   Element
>       A part of an architecture (component, connector, or data).
>       Relationships between elements are constrained in order to
>       achieve a desired set of architectural properties.

I'd suggest calling this an "Architectural Element".  Then instead of
"part" you could just use "element".

Mark Baker.   Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.        http://www.markbaker.ca
Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2003 10:10:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:14 GMT