- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 16:39:54 +0100
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Hi Mark. * Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org> [2003-02-06 10:12-0500] > > I think that Fielding's dissertation excerpt could be reworded as: > > > > Element > > > > A part of an architecture (component, connector, or data). > > Relationships between elements are constrained in order to > > achieve a desired set of architectural properties. > > I'd suggest calling this an "Architectural Element". Then instead of > "part" you could just use "element". If we do this, we have: Architectural element: An element of an architecture [..] which is somewhat circular. I do not like "part" too much, but couldn't find a better word. Regards, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2003 10:40:10 UTC