W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > April 2003

RE: There is no spoon Neo

From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 11:12:41 -0700
Message-ID: <EDDE2977F3D216428E903370E3EBDDC9081190@MAIL01.stc.com>
To: "Francis McCabe" <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

Frank,
Are you referring to a set of Web services mutually related through a choreography context? If that is the case, one of the choreography groups would probably be the right place to ask for the composite identifier you are talking about.

Ugo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Francis McCabe [mailto:fgm@fla.fujitsu.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 10:37 AM
> To: Sanjiva Weerawarana
> Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: Re: There is no spoon Neo
> 
> 
> 
> Identifying Web service with a single entrypoint is fine; except that 
> in the real world most people consider a Web service to denote a 
> related set of entrypoints. (My terminology: to avoid getting into 
> semantics).
> 
> I.e., most people will need to describe/manage/deal with sets 
> of these 
> things in a coherent way. This is precisely what the concept of a 
> composite web service is targeted at.
> 
> If you restrict the concept of Web service to the single entrypoint 
> case, you `solve' one problem (what is meant by a Web 
> service's URI for 
> example) but leave unanswered the larger scale issues.
> 
> Frank
> 
> On Monday, April 28, 2003, at 10:22  AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
> 
> > "Francis McCabe" <fgm@fla.fujitsu.com> writes:
> >>
> >> This proposal is only going to fly technically if we also grasp the
> >> composite service nettle.
> >
> > I'm sorry but I don't understand; can you elaborate please?
> >
> > Sanjiva.
> >
> >
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 28 April 2003 14:12:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:18 GMT