W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > April 2003

RE: Message Reliability Text

From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 13:02:41 -0700
Message-ID: <EDDE2977F3D216428E903370E3EBDDC9081B15@MAIL01.stc.com>
To: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Correction: "defining a Binding Framework" should of course be "defining a binding". 

-----Original Message-----
From: Ugo Corda 
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 11:22 AM
To: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler); www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: Message Reliability Text

I think we should add something in the final part about the fact that the transport choice can affect the actual implementation. Something like:
"WS-Reliability (...) and WS-ReliableMessaging (...) are example of acknowledgement infrastructure specifications that leverage the SOAP Extensibility Model. In cases where the underlying transport layer already provides reliable messaging support (e.g. a queue-based infrastructure), the same reliability Feature can be achieved in SOAP by defining a Binding Framework that relies on the underlying properties of the transport".
Received on Friday, 25 April 2003 16:02:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:41:06 UTC