W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > April 2003

RE: Message Reliability Text

From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@chevrontexaco.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 16:27:45 -0500
Message-ID: <7FCB5A9F010AAE419A79A54B44F3718E026EF645@bocnte2k3.boc.chevrontexaco.net>
To: "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
cc: fgm@fla.fujitsu.com, Eric.Newcomer@iona.com
Certainly OK by me.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 3:03 PM
To: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler); www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: Message Reliability Text


Correction: "defining a Binding Framework" should of course be "defining
a binding". 

	-----Original Message-----
	From: Ugo Corda 
	Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 11:22 AM
	To: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler); www-ws-arch@w3.org
	Subject: RE: Message Reliability Text
	
	
	I think we should add something in the final part about the fact
that the transport choice can affect the actual implementation.
Something like:
	 
	"WS-Reliability (...) and WS-ReliableMessaging (...) are example
of acknowledgement infrastructure specifications that leverage the SOAP
Extensibility Model. In cases where the underlying transport layer
already provides reliable messaging support (e.g. a queue-based
infrastructure), the same reliability Feature can be achieved in SOAP by
defining a Binding Framework that relies on the underlying properties of
the transport".
	 
	 
	Ugo
Received on Friday, 25 April 2003 17:28:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:18 GMT