RE: Message Reliability Text

Certainly OK by me.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 3:03 PM
To: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler); www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: Message Reliability Text


Correction: "defining a Binding Framework" should of course be "defining
a binding". 

	-----Original Message-----
	From: Ugo Corda 
	Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 11:22 AM
	To: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler); www-ws-arch@w3.org
	Subject: RE: Message Reliability Text
	
	
	I think we should add something in the final part about the fact
that the transport choice can affect the actual implementation.
Something like:
	 
	"WS-Reliability (...) and WS-ReliableMessaging (...) are example
of acknowledgement infrastructure specifications that leverage the SOAP
Extensibility Model. In cases where the underlying transport layer
already provides reliable messaging support (e.g. a queue-based
infrastructure), the same reliability Feature can be achieved in SOAP by
defining a Binding Framework that relies on the underlying properties of
the transport".
	 
	 
	Ugo