W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Words for the Triangles

From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:53:11 -0700
Message-ID: <C513FB68F8200244B570543EF3FC65370A855B34@MAIL1.stc.com>
To: "'Munter, Joel D'" <joel.d.munter@intel.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org

Joel,
Yes, I did not mean to imply that the replication mechanism had been
abandoned.

Ugo

-----Original Message-----
From: Munter, Joel D [mailto:joel.d.munter@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 1:46 PM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: Words for the Triangles



ugo,
uddi v3 still retains the notion that a (single) registry may be comprised
of multiple (replicating) nodes.  with uddi v3 we addressed the need for
registry-to-registry communication.
joel

-----Original Message-----
From: Ugo Corda [mailto:UCorda@SeeBeyond.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:58 AM
To: 'Hugo Haas'; www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: Words for the Triangles



>I think that UDDI hints at a central registry solution, and putting it
>in a sentence such as "the key to reaching this new horizon is a
>common program-to-program communication model" definitely pushes in
>this direction.

Version 3 of UDDI has moved away from the concept of a central registry.
UDDI 3 supports multiregistry topologies (which is different than version
2's multinode topologies based on node replication). For more details, see
UDDI 3 section 8, "Publishing Across Multiple Registries" [1].

Ugo

[1] http://www.uddi.org/pubs/uddi-v3.00-published-20020719.htm#_Toc12653784
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 16:53:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:06 GMT