W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Words for the Triangles

From: Munter, Joel D <joel.d.munter@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 13:47:48 -0700
Message-ID: <ABEEEAB5C59AD51186D900508BB268B90F61F06B@fmsmsx102.fm.intel.com>
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org

if you do not already have them, you still need to be able to "find" the
wsdl files.  that is what uddi is designed to do.  joel

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 10:41 AM
To: Ugo Corda
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Re: Words for the Triangles

By using UDDI that way, you've completely marginalized it!  Good job!

Seriously, everything UDDI would do for you in that case could be done
better with URIs and GET.  I think the de-facto standard WSDL-over-GET 
demonstrates that.


On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:46:16AM -0700, Ugo Corda wrote:
> Mark,
> If A and B are two partners in a B2B interaction, B could maintain a
> UDDI registry and A could be given access to it. So A's best way to access
> services' interfaces could be through B's UDDI.
> I am not saying that it's the only way for A to communicate with B. I am
> just pointing out that the concept of UDDI as a third party dropped into
> otherwise pure P2P scenario is not that clearly cut in all cases.
> Ugo

Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Thursday, 26 September 2002 16:48:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:59 UTC