W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Reading list for September Face to Face meeting

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 09:30:46 -0700
To: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@softwareag-usa.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <03e501c255c2$c185c120$0100007f@beasys.com>

> > and anything not ( perhaps yet ) endorsed by the TAG is not
> part of the web
> > architecture.
> Had I known that the existence of the TAG was going to nullify any
> architectural descriptions that preceeded its deliverables, I
> would have
> voted it against its chartering.  Sheesh! 8-O  Surely you're not
> serious?

You're correct, my bad.  There are many things that aren't endorsed by the
TAG that are part of web arch.  But where the TAG does define work, it's
definitive.  I'm trying to avoid the problem whereby somebody, even as
illustrious as TimBL, believes that something should be document as a
principle of the web - think of the http range issue.  Until the TAG
ratifies it, I don't think we should treat opinions, etc. as authoritative.

Anyways, this is ranging (:-) far from web services arch specific discussion
so I'll stop now.

Received on Friday, 6 September 2002 12:33:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:40:59 UTC