- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 12:27:05 -0400
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>, "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@softwareag-usa.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 07:59:37AM -0700, David Orchard wrote: > <snip/> > > but I don't believe it's in the best interest of this > > WG, the W3C > > at large, or the Web itself, that we don't treat REST as > > authoritative. > > > > Who said anything about that? I called out Roy's thesis and the w3c TAG doc > as authoritative material on REST. You did! When you said; ] My principle is that the ] TAG work is pretty darned definitive on whatever it's chosen to document, ] and anything not ( perhaps yet ) endorsed by the TAG is not part of the web ] architecture. If you meant to exclude Roy's dissertation from that, then that's fine, but I hope you don't blame me for not inferring that. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Friday, 6 September 2002 12:28:24 UTC