W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > October 2002

RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description

From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 10:49:32 -0700
Message-ID: <C513FB68F8200244B570543EF3FC65370A855BCF@MAIL1.stc.com>
To: "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@softwareag-usa.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org

FYI, I recently came across an interesting comparison between BPEL4WS and
DAML-S. See [1].

Ugo

[1] http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/projects/DAML/Webservices/DAMLS-BPEL.html


-----Original Message-----
From: Champion, Mike [mailto:Mike.Champion@softwareag-usa.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 8:16 AM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description





> -----Original Message-----
> From: Katia Sycara [mailto:katia@cs.cmu.edu]
> Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 9:30 AM
> To: David Booth; Heather Kreger; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description
> 
> 
> 
> +1!
>  I would be interested in helping define a WS ontology in OWL.
>   --Katia

Starting with the current "triangle" framework"  Or perhaps a subset of the
concepts in WSCI?  I would be very interested in seeing some sort of OWL or
RDF formalization of something that we think we understand to see what it
adds, how it could help us, etc.  

I'll preach the usual sermon about not being distracted for the next couple
of weeks, but perhaps a demonstration of how "ontological thinking" can help
us clarify the Web architecture and how choreography fits in could be very
valuable.  

 
Received on Saturday, 19 October 2002 13:50:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:09 GMT