W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > October 2002

RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description

From: Katia Sycara <katia@cs.cmu.edu>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 13:33:37 -0400
To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Cc: katia@cs.cmu.edu
Message-ID: <NFBBLCDGGLCHCHFEJFIGIELACIAA.katia@cs.cmu.edu>

Mike,
 I do not promise quick results (I am on almost continuous travel for the
next few weeks), but it would be interesting to try.
 David B. or anyone else that would like to be involved please let me know.
 --katia

-----Original Message-----
From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Champion, Mike
Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 11:16 AM
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description





> -----Original Message-----
> From: Katia Sycara [mailto:katia@cs.cmu.edu]
> Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 9:30 AM
> To: David Booth; Heather Kreger; www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description
>
>
>
> +1!
>  I would be interested in helping define a WS ontology in OWL.
>   --Katia

Starting with the current "triangle" framework"  Or perhaps a subset of the
concepts in WSCI?  I would be very interested in seeing some sort of OWL or
RDF formalization of something that we think we understand to see what it
adds, how it could help us, etc.

I'll preach the usual sermon about not being distracted for the next couple
of weeks, but perhaps a demonstration of how "ontological thinking" can help
us clarify the Web architecture and how choreography fits in could be very
valuable.
Received on Saturday, 19 October 2002 13:34:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:09 GMT