- From: Champion, Mike <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 14:23:22 -0400
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ricky Ho [mailto:riho@cisco.com] > Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 9:17 PM > To: Burdett, David; 'Champion, Mike'; www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: RE: Definition of Choreography > > > Can the public protocol be just an XML > representation of a state machine. Each state constraint > what event can happen (event can be what SOAP message to send or what SOAP > message to receive). Each event defines the next state. Effectively, > we are defining what are the possible message exchange sequence without > describing the internal decision making process. I like this idea a lot. Can anyone sketch out an example of how one might model a little corner of one of the choreography specs using a state machine notation?
Received on Saturday, 19 October 2002 14:23:23 UTC