W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Spec draft

From: Sanjiva Weerawarana <sanjiva@watson.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:58:09 +0600
Message-ID: <004c01c26b9d$511567b0$9800a8c0@lankabook2>
To: "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>, "'Newcomer, Eric'" <Eric.Newcomer@iona.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>

"Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> writes:
> - second block of text just below Figure 2,
> "The request/response pattern is also often called the remote procedure
call
> (RPC) oriented interaction style"
>
> It might often be called that way, but I don't think it's a good idea to
> reinforce that belief here. The interaction style, RPC or document, should
> be completely orthogonal to the request/response pattern, so that, for
> instance, I can have a request/response pattern that uses the document
style
> instead of RPC.

+1

I would personally like to see the WSDL SOAP binding completely
change the terminology of "document" vs. "rpc" to attempt to
reduce the confusion that request/response == RPC.

Sanjiva.
Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 07:59:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:09 GMT