W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > October 2002

Re: Spec draft

From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 08:21:29 -0400
To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFDF31754B.270920E1-ON85256C48.00435BDC-85256C48.0043C600@rchland.ibm.com>
+1

Christopher Ferris
Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
phone: +1 508 234 3624

www-ws-arch-request@w3.org wrote on 10/04/2002 07:58:09 AM:

> 
> "Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com> writes:
> > - second block of text just below Figure 2,
> > "The request/response pattern is also often called the remote 
procedure
> call
> > (RPC) oriented interaction style"
> >
> > It might often be called that way, but I don't think it's a good idea 
to
> > reinforce that belief here. The interaction style, RPC or document, 
should
> > be completely orthogonal to the request/response pattern, so that, for
> > instance, I can have a request/response pattern that uses the document
> style
> > instead of RPC.
> 
> +1
> 
> I would personally like to see the WSDL SOAP binding completely
> change the terminology of "document" vs. "rpc" to attempt to
> reduce the confusion that request/response == RPC.
> 
> Sanjiva.
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 4 October 2002 08:22:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:09 GMT