W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > October 2002

RE: Current summary of Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:23:44 -0700
To: "'Champion, Mike'" <Mike.Champion@softwareag-usa.com>, <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
Message-ID: <009901c26a59$fd1c7750$1b0ba8c0@beasys.com>

I don't want to focus on this issue any more.

How about DRegistry where a D on a term indicates it's a Draft term, but not
final?  Same thing we do with reqs.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-ws-arch-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-arch-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Champion, Mike
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:15 PM
> To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Current summary of Label for Top Node of
> "triangle diagram"
>
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:22 PM
> > To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
> > Subject: Current summary of Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
> >
> >
>
> Thanks, Dave, this is VERY appreciated!!!!
>
> > Seems that the use of Registry is ok for the most number of
> > people but it also has an objection.
> >
> > I'm not sure quite how to get to consensus on this issue.
>
> Do people think we need to arrive at consensus quickly?  In
> light of my
> message about the Choreography effort, I'd be happy if we
> called this the
> "Registry, Repository, Discovery Mechanism/Agency, or
> Whatever", known by
> the acronuym RRDMAW, so we can move on. (I'm only about half
> joking!) Maybe
> after we have some perspective on what the rest of the
> framework looks like,
> the answer will become clearer.
>
> As someone (many people?) noted, "naming things" is one of
> the two hardest
> problems in computer science. IMHO, we should try to keep it
> out of our
> critical path.
> >
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2002 17:27:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:09 GMT