W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > July 2002

RE: Reliable messaging; solution or requirement?

From: Damodaran, Suresh <Suresh_Damodaran@stercomm.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:29:28 -0500
Message-ID: <40AC2C8FB855D411AE0200D0B7458B2B07C5985A@scidalmsg01.csg.stercomm.com>
To: "'Mark Baker'" <distobj@acm.org>, Joseph Hui <Joseph.Hui@exodus.net>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org



Mark, you are talking of achieving some "goal" by co-ordinating.
What might that goal be? 

Cheers,

-Suresh
Sterling Commerce   



-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:57 PM
To: Joseph Hui
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Subject: Reliable messaging; solution or requirement?



On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:22:36PM -0700, Joseph Hui wrote:
> There's a chasm between our understandings in what constitutes
> a specific solution (based on our previous few message exchanges),

Let's see if I can capture the two positions.

You (and others) appear to believe that unreliable messaging is a
problem requiring a solution.

My belief is that the problem is "reliable coordination".  That is,
how do two pieces of software distributed on an unreliable network,
coordinate to achieve some goal in a reliable manner (such that both
know that the goal has been achieved or failed, etc..)?  So I see
"reliable messaging" as just one possible solution to that problem.

Does that help?

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2002 17:30:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:25:01 GMT