AFAIK there's been no proposal or advocacy to mix the two up. There's a natural bond between the two -- when speak of a WS-Arch, think of the WS defined, for instance; thus the separation might appear to be as less than perfectly clear now and then. BTW, I didn't find it necessary to second Mark's "strong opinion." (The reference of "strong opinion" here must not be taken out of context, lest Mark be misconstrued as an opinionated fella :-) The separation or the need for such was understood, IMHO. Cheers, Joe Hui Exodus, a Cable & Wireless service ====================================================== > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Newcomer [mailto:eric.newcomer@iona.com] > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 4:30 PM > To: Mark Baker; Joseph Hui > Cc: Champion Mike; "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)"; > steve.vinoski@iona.com; www-ws-arch@w3.org > Subject: RE: Web Service Definition [Was "Some Thoughts ..."] > > > > I'm also strongly of the opinion that we > >*should* define what a web service is separate from what the > >requirements of an architecture should be to support them. There's > >additional value add there. > > +1 > > >Received on Monday, 25 February 2002 22:06:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 3 July 2007 12:24:54 GMT