RE: MINUTES WebOnt telecon 15/02/2004

On January 29, Jeremy Carroll writes:
> 
> 
> Ian,
> 
> just, clarifying a small ambiguity on XMLLiteral
> 
> >
> > > ACTION: Ian to find a better phrasing to adapt/clarify the
> > > specification if necessary.
> >
> > Current proposal from me - agree with Jeremy's proposed change to Test
> > and no change to S&AS.
> >
> 
> (unfortunately I am so fickle that "Jeremy's proposed change" could mean
> almost anyhting!)
> 
> I take you to mean only the modification to test misc-205 (one word) not the
> bigger change that was in my December "Possible compromise" i.e.

I meant the one word modification to test misc-205.

Ian

> 
> =====
> OWL Test
> a)
> Section 4.2.2
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/PR-owl-test-20031215/#consistencyChecker
> Add between the definition of "OWL Full consistency checker" and "complete
> OWL Lite consistency checker" a new paragraph as follows.
> [[
> The datatype map of an OWL Full consistency checker MUST also support
> rdf:XMLLiteral from [RDF Concepts].
> ]]
> 
> ======
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Dec/0100.html
> 
> 
> Jeremy