just on that specific point from Sandro: > I have no expectation of making any progress on the Negative Entailment > Tests or Consistent tests, however. I also refused for months to run negative entailment tests and consistency tests as they are not really fitting with constructive stuff (no no proof is not a proof). For now I run them and find them quite useful. For instance finding a proof for a negative entailment test (which we happen to have) is unsound; same for finding that a consistent formula is inconsistent. Otoh, because our axiomatization is incomplete the results of those tests are actually incomplete, but another incomplete than timeout... -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/Received on Sunday, 7 September 2003 13:42:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT