W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > October 2003

Re: Test Results Organisation

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:14:13 -0400
Message-Id: <200310080414.h984EDiF018757@roke.hawke.org>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>, www-webont-wg@w3.org


> Also the twice passed proposed should exclude tests that are being failed 
> by anyone

I don't agree.  Two interoperable implementations is considered good
evidence of the spec being decent, regardless of how many broken
implementations there are.  I also don't want us to be motivated to
exclude people's results just because they fail some tests -- that
should look bad for them, not us.

> - and a further section on other proposed tests may be interesting.

Speaking of interoperability, I wonder if anyone else has tried
running RDF queries over this data?  I'd think it would be pretty easy
for someone comfortable with some RDF toolkit.  Is there anything
I could do, at my end, to make it easier?   (Like, I could provide one
RDF file with all the results combined, or something.)

      -- sandro
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2003 00:17:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT