- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:14:13 -0400
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
> Also the twice passed proposed should exclude tests that are being failed
> by anyone
I don't agree. Two interoperable implementations is considered good
evidence of the spec being decent, regardless of how many broken
implementations there are. I also don't want us to be motivated to
exclude people's results just because they fail some tests -- that
should look bad for them, not us.
> - and a further section on other proposed tests may be interesting.
Speaking of interoperability, I wonder if anyone else has tried
running RDF queries over this data? I'd think it would be pretty easy
for someone comfortable with some RDF toolkit. Is there anything
I could do, at my end, to make it easier? (Like, I could provide one
RDF file with all the results combined, or something.)
-- sandro
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2003 00:17:29 UTC