- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 13:44:16 +0100
- To: Sean Bechhofer <seanb@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Also the twice passed proposed should exclude tests that are being failed by anyone - and a further section on other proposed tests may be interesting. Jeremy Sean Bechhofer wrote: > > A while ago I raised the possibility of splitting the display of test > results to take into account the different species levels as well as the > approved/proposed status [1]. This would have the benefit of making it > easier to identify whether implementations targeting a particular > language species were on track (and determining whether, for example, an > implementation provides a substantial subset of DL [cf. exit criterion > 4]). > > I would have thought this would be relatively easy to do as the > information is all there in the manifests. Can I propose that we > make this change? > > Sean > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Sep/0130.html > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2003 09:00:55 UTC