> A while ago (sorry I missed it) > I raised the possibility of splitting the display of test > results to take into account the different species levels as well as the > approved/proposed status [1]. This would have the benefit of making it > easier to identify whether implementations targeting a particular > language species were on track (and determining whether, for example, an > implementation provides a substantial subset of DL [cf. exit criterion > 4]). Are you thinking just separating Full and Not-Full, or all the categories Lite, DL, Full, Lite+Full, and DL+Full? I just moved the level information before the test name and also made it earlier in the sort key; perhaps that shows the information you want without giving us too many tiny tables? -- sandroReceived on Wednesday, 8 October 2003 00:06:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT