W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > October 2003

Guide tests

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 17:41:40 +0100
Message-ID: <3F819B44.2040504@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org

After discussion within HP ....


===

HP developers are surprised that the tests from the OWL Guide are not being 
passed by any systems.

We are particularly concerned since the comment:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0046
"have long CR period for OWL, or move owl:oneOf, owl: have Value to OWL Full"

alerted the Working Group to our fears in this area, and the reply

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jun/0023

particularly
[[
The WG has been made aware of implementations of OWL DL that include
both inverseOf and oneOf and which seem to be performing well in
practice.  The working group will definitely consider their status
and usability before deciding on our schedule with respect to
Candidate Recommendation and Proposed Recommendation.
]]

seemed to suggest that the potential problem was under control.

Since this seems to have been mistaken, we request that discussion of the 
Last Call comment from Martin Merry be reopened.

Jeremy Carroll, HP
Received on Monday, 6 October 2003 13:01:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:02 GMT