On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 03:31, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > The HP team report that we have had difficulty working on owl:sameAs > because different team members are working from different documents. > > S&AS excludes owl:sameAs from OWL DL and OWL Lite. > Guide recommends not using owl:sameAs (ever), but states that it is > synonomous with owl:sameIndividualAs, and suggests that using owl:sameAs > between classes is in full. > Ref is more positive about owl:sameAs. > > It would be helpful if the story were clearer, in particular Ref and Guide > should say that all uses of owl:sameAs are in Full (personally, I would not > mind simply dropping owl:sameAs). I'd prefer to have just one; let's call it sameAs though. > Jeremy -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 15:20:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:41 GMT