W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > May 2003

Re: owl:sameAs confusion (Ref and Guide)

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 01:49:15 +0200
To: "Dan Connolly <connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: ijd@hplb.hpl.hp.com, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org, www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFE4F6CFCC.0BE8ED24-ONC1256D36.0082B464-C1256D36.0082DA0E@agfa.be>


> On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 03:31, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> > The HP team report that we have had difficulty working on owl:sameAs
> > because different team members are working from different documents.
> >
> > S&AS excludes owl:sameAs from OWL DL and OWL Lite.
> > Guide recommends not using owl:sameAs (ever), but states that it is
> > synonomous with owl:sameIndividualAs, and suggests that using
owl:sameAs
> > between classes is in full.
> > Ref is more positive about owl:sameAs.
> >
> > It would be helpful if the story were clearer, in particular Ref and
Guide
> > should say that all uses of owl:sameAs are in Full (personally, I would
not
> > mind simply dropping owl:sameAs).
>
> I'd prefer to have just one; let's call it sameAs though.

seconded

> > Jeremy
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 19:49:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:00 GMT