> On Wed, 2003-05-28 at 03:31, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > The HP team report that we have had difficulty working on owl:sameAs > > because different team members are working from different documents. > > > > S&AS excludes owl:sameAs from OWL DL and OWL Lite. > > Guide recommends not using owl:sameAs (ever), but states that it is > > synonomous with owl:sameIndividualAs, and suggests that using owl:sameAs > > between classes is in full. > > Ref is more positive about owl:sameAs. > > > > It would be helpful if the story were clearer, in particular Ref and Guide > > should say that all uses of owl:sameAs are in Full (personally, I would not > > mind simply dropping owl:sameAs). > > I'd prefer to have just one; let's call it sameAs though. seconded > > Jeremy > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/Received on Friday, 30 May 2003 19:49:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:00 GMT