W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > March 2003


From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:26:58 +0100
To: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

I just had a question from a colleague on the term owl:OntologyProperty
appearing in S&AS ...

He's more up on it than I am.

This does not seem to reflect any WG decision :(
in particular it is not mentioned nor implicit in

part E

As I understand it, the only ontologyPropertyIDs are the built-in ones,
which do not need such a declaration.

If we are permitting user defined ones then we would need an axiom for their

Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2003 09:26:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:52 UTC