W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > March 2003

owl:OntologyProperty

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:26:58 +0100
To: <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDCEFGCBAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


I just had a question from a colleague on the term owl:OntologyProperty
appearing in S&AS ...

He's more up on it than I am.

This does not seem to reflect any WG decision :(
in particular it is not mentioned nor implicit in

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0066.html
part E

As I understand it, the only ontologyPropertyIDs are the built-in ones,
which do not need such a declaration.

If we are permitting user defined ones then we would need an axiom for their
definition.

Jeremy
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2003 09:26:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:58 GMT