W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > March 2003

Re: owl:OntologyProperty

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:33:51 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20030325.103351.54756489.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org

From: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Subject: owl:OntologyProperty
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:26:58 +0100

> 
> 
> I just had a question from a colleague on the term owl:OntologyProperty
> appearing in S&AS ...
> 
> He's more up on it than I am.
> 
> This does not seem to reflect any WG decision :(
> in particular it is not mentioned nor implicit in
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Mar/0066.html
> part E
> 
> As I understand it, the only ontologyPropertyIDs are the built-in ones,
> which do not need such a declaration.

Agreed.

> If we are permitting user defined ones then we would need an axiom for their
> definition.

Agreed.

> Jeremy

I don't know what this has to do with owl:OntologyProperty, however.

peter
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2003 10:36:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:58 GMT