thx for the review. the best version to read is the editors version: http://www.ksl.stanford.edu/people/dlm/webont/OWLOverview.htm that version had found the problem below and has a couple of other minor updates that came up after feb 10. deborah Jeff Z. Pan wrote: >Web Ontology Language (OWL): Overview >W3C Working Draft 10 February 2003 > >Section 1.3, last paragraph: > >"OWL Full can be viewed as an extension of RDF, while OWL Lite and OWL *Full* can >be viewed as extensions of a restricted view of RDF. " > >should be > >"OWL Full can be viewed as an extension of RDF, while OWL Lite and OWL *DL* can >be viewed as extensions of a restricted view of RDF. " > >Jeff >-- >Jeff Z. Pan ( http://DL-Web.man.ac.uk/ ) >Computer Science Dept., The University of Manchester > > > >Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2003 12:16:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:58 GMT