W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > March 2003

Re: TEST, GUIDE: food.owl, wine.owl

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 07:13:26 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <20030303.071326.125104015.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU
Cc: michael.smith@eds.com, jjc@hpl.hp.com, www-webont-wg@w3.org

I looked in some of the CLASSIC directories for the wines KB, and was
surprised to be reminded that it formed the running example of the ``Living
with Classic'' paper.  I expect that a reference to this paper would be
appropriate. 

Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Bell Labs Research
 

From: "Deborah L. McGuinness" <dlm@ksl.Stanford.EDU>
Subject: Re: TEST, GUIDE: food.owl, wine.owl
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 17:28:43 -0800

> 
> the original daml ontology is in the daml ontology library.
> i wrote the original wines ontology and then used ontolingua to 
> translate it into daml (and cleaned it up a bit).
> 
> it is up at:
> http://www.daml.org/ontologies/76
> 
> it is fine for it to have mike, chris, and me as authors since although 
> i did the initial content, it has had a number of revisions.
> 
> d
> 
> Smith, Michael K wrote:
> 
> >I think Guide editors is apt, if there is a pointer somehow
> >to the original DAML ontology. (Deb, what do you think?) 
> >The organization and relation have changed a great deal 
> >from that document, but much of the content is the the same.
> >
> >- Mike
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hpl.hp.com]
> >Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 3:36 AM
> >To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> >Subject: TEST, GUIDE: food.owl, wine.owl
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >To whom should I credit these documents?
> >(Every test is listed with one or more authors)
> >(Currently I credit them to "Guide editors").
> >
> >Jeremy
> >
> >  
> >
> 
Received on Monday, 3 March 2003 07:13:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:58 GMT