- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:24:56 +0100
- To: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- CC: pfps@research.bell-labs.com, jjc@hpl.hp.com, www-webont-wg@w3.org, www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
>>>How much baby goes out with the bath water? Another example is to do with rdf:List. In the OWL DL syntactic subset you can only use this as part of intersections unions etc. It may be natural to use rdf:List within user ontologies (certainly Bijan's question about daml:item suggests so). Any reasoning about such lists as needed to restrict them to be lists of certain things would behave differently from other reasoning. A range constraint might be OK, but a restiction might not. Jeremy
Received on Monday, 30 June 2003 07:26:02 UTC