W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > June 2003

Re: Agenda for June 26 telecon

From: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 10:14:33 -0400
Message-ID: <3EFAFFC9.5578D16C@cse.lehigh.edu>
To: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
CC: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

In my message of May 15 [1], I suggested a possible way to approach this
issue, but it didn't seem to generate any interest at that time. Seeing
as Dave was unsatisified with our first try, I'll bring my suggestion up
again. I had said:

> I think we need to provide a table that translates from RDF to the
> abstract syntax (if it has to be non-normative then so be it). There may
> be some complexity in describing the fact that some RDF graphs are
> disallowed, but I believe it can be managed. For example, we could do an
> allValuesFrom restriction as follows:

> _:x rdf:type owl:Restriction .| restriction(T(ID) allValuesFrom(T(range)))
> _:x rdf:type owl:Class . [opt]  |
> _:x rdf:type rdfs:Class . [opt] |
> _:x owl:onProperty ID .         |
> _:x owl:allValuesFrom range .   |
> * no others with subject _:x *  |

> Note, the "no others" part is needed to indicate the OWL-Lite/DL
> restriction that a Restriction is limited in what properties it may
> have. In particular, you can't have allValuesFrom with someValuesFrom,
> hasValue, cardinality, etc.


Jeff

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003May/0256.html

Jim Hendler wrote:
> 
> If anyone has something they'd like added to agenda, please let me
> know.  Guus to start out as chair as I may be late to meeting.
>  -JH
> 
> WEB ONTOLOGY WORKING GROUP
> AGENDA/LOGISTICS
> June 26, 2003
> 
> 1200 US East Coast
> 0900 US West Coast
> 1700 London
> 0200 Tokyo (next day)
> Chair: Guus Schreiber
> Scribe: TBD
> 
> 1.0 Admin
> 
> roll call
> 
> approve minutes from:
> Regular meeting of June 12
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jun/0170.html
> 
> Editors meeting of June 17
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jun/0289.html
> 
> next call - July 3
> Chair: Hendler
> Scribe: TBD
> 
> 2.0 Action review
>  Update of actions on open thread review (see bottom of agenda)
> 
> 3.0 SameAs Discussion (Issue 4.6)
> See Guus' email
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jun/0345.html
> 
> 4.0 Compound Keys
> Proposal to open and postpone (Jim or Guus will try to have this
> written before the meeting, otherwise we will just straw poll about
> opening and postponing)
> 
> 5.0 Dave Beckett's response
> in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jun/0068.html
> Dave Beckett does not accept our proposed response.  We need to decide
> how to proceed - chair will entertain suggestions
> 
> 6.0 Test LC Update
> Place holder in the agenda in case anything comes up.
> 
> 7.0 AOB
> 
> ========================
> Open Threads reviewed.
> 
>  7 Items closed.  Lines begin with CLOSED.
> 15 Items waiting for acknowledgement.  Lines begin with WAITING FOR
> ACK.
> 25 Actions identified.  Lines begin with ACTION or CONTINUED.
> 
> 1. "sameAs" error in OWL Language Reference 31 March 2003
> 
> Deemed adequate response.
> ACTION: Jim Hendler.  Send response.
> ACTION: Jeremy Carroll.  Generate test case.
> 
> 2. Restriction, DeprecatedClass in OWL Language Reference 31 March
> 2003
> 
> ACTION: Guus Schreiber will craft process response.
> 
> 3. unspecified domain,range in App. C of OWL Language Reference 31
> March
> 2003
> CONTINUED: 12Jun ACTION: Mike Dean to respond.
> 
> 5. Nothing in App. B of OWL Language Reference 31 March 2003
> 
> CLOSED. Moved to RDF logic.
> 
> 6. Missing AllDisjoint?
> 
> DONE: 12Jun ACTION: DanC
> 12Jun minute: DanC to respond: quote rationale from resolution on 5.21
> 
> WAITING FOR ACK.
> 
> 7. S&AS comments
> 
> WAITING FOR ACK.
> 
> 8. OWL S&AS comment - owl:imports
> 
> ACTION: Jeff Heflin - waiting for approval of response to send.
> 
> 9. OWL S&AS: Translation to RDF Graphs
> 
> DONE: 12Jun ACTION: DanC.   16 June 2003.
> 
> 10. OWL Reference comment - RDF Schema for OWL
> 
> Guus S. sent propose response.  Approved
> ACTION: Guus S. to send response.
> 
> 12. Re: privacy in OWL
> 
> ACTION: Guus S. to propose response.
> ACTION: Mike Smith. Guide to xref any Ref. change.
> 
> 15. OWL comment - language subsets and complexity
> 
> DONE: 12Jun minute: ??? to respond
> Ian Horrocks sent.
> 
> WAITING FOR ACK.
> 
> 16. OWL comment - blank nodes in OWL DL
> 
> Named data ranges
> Blank nodes used more than once. Jeremy Carroll B1, B2 proof in
> progress.
> Syntactic restrictions on unnamed indiv. (Covered)
> PENDING.
> 
> 17. OWL S&AS Comment - owl:imports
> 
> Proposed response sent to WG by Heflin.
> ACTION: Jim Hendler to review.
> 
> 19. Problem with PET of sections 7.1.5 and 7.1.6 of OWL test cases
> 
> WAITING FOR ACK.
> ACTION: Jim Hendler to confirm our response.
> 
> 21. daml:item
> 
> ACTION: Jim Hendler. Respond with pointer to Issue 5.5.
> 
> 22. RDFCore Comments on OWL Reference
> 
> Guus sent partial response.
> WAITING FOR ACK.
> 
> ACTION: Frank van Harmelen to respond to one open element.
> 
> 23. Comments from RDFCore on S+AS
> 
> WAITING FOR ACK.
> 
> 24. Another RDF Comment on the OWL Reference Doc
> 
> DONE: 12 Jun ACTION: Sean
> WAITING FOR ACK.
> 
> 25. Comments on Owl REF document
> 
> DONE: 12Jun ACTION: Guus (sent to WG, approved by Dan)
> 
> ACTION: Guus to send.
> 
> 26. inadequate reference in Owl REF
> 
> Guus had a link to S&AS built-in datatypes that are problematic.
> Now in the RDF semantics.  S&AS points to that.
> 
> ACTION: Jeremey Carroll to send RDF link to Guus, Peter, Mike S.
> 
> 27. Review section 4.1 of OWL AS&S
> 
> DONE: 12Jun ACTION: Ian. Mailed to WG for approval.
> Waiting for approval.
> 
> 28. Non-global Keys
> 
> Compound keys not in response.
> ACTION: Guus to find record of decision and propose Issue to be
> postponed.
> ACTION: Jim Hendler to add to proposed response.
> 
> 29. OWL Comment: have long CR period for OWL, or move owl:oneOf, owl:
> have
> Value to OWL Full
> 
> WAITING FOR ACK.
> 
> 30. OWL comment - owl:OntologyProperty
> 
> DONE: 12Jun ACTION: Guus.
> 12Jun ACTION: Jeremy. CONTINUED.
> 12Jun minute: Jeremy to respond
> ACTION: Guus to make Ref consistent with resolution
> 
> 31. Semantics and Abstract Syntax (and some general OWL Lite, CR, &
> implementation) comments
> 
> WAITING FOR ACK.
> 
> 32. Language Overview Document editorial comments
> 
> DONE: 12Jun ACTION: Frank.
> 12Jun minute: Frank to respond, editorial
> 
> WAITING FOR ACK. We think.
> 
> ACTION: Guus to find our response.
> 
> 33. OWL and Published Subjects
> 
> ACTION: Jim to respond.
> 
> 34. Could owl:sameAs reference non-OWL resources?
> 
> 12Jun ACTION: Pat. CONTINUED.
> 12Jun minute: Pat to respond
> 
> ACTION: Guus to check status.
> 
> 35. OWL Abstract Syntax and Semantics review comments
> 
> WAITING FOR ACK.
> 
> 36. Missing AllSame
> 
> DONE: 12Jun ACTION: Guus.
> 12Jun minute: Rationale for no AllSame: linear
> 
> WAITING FOR ACK.
> 
> 37. about/base and Free to implementations
> 
> WAITING FOR ACK.
> 
> 38. QA Review of owl-semantics
> 
> Sandro sent proposed reply.
> 
> ACTION: Dan, Jim, Guus to review reply.
> ACTION: Guus to send proposed words re xrefs to all docs.
> ACTION: Peter, Guus, Frank, MKS, Jeremy, Jeff.
> All editors add link from their document to ALL others.
> 
> 39. Fwd: Jena comment: Syntax Checker Implementation Report]
> 
> WAITING FOR ACK.
> 
> 40. comments on OWL Last Call drafts
> WAITING FOR ACK.
> 
> --
> 
> Professor James Hendler                           hendler@cs.umd.edu
> Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies         301-405-2696
> Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.      301-405-6707 (Fax)
> Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742      *** 240-277-3388 (Cell)
> http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler      *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER
> ***
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2003 10:14:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT